From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-devel-return-1752-listarch-ecos-devel=sources.redhat.com@ecos.sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24365 invoked by alias); 11 May 2010 12:49:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 24348 invoked by uid 22791); 11 May 2010 12:49:46 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_50,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from ip2.televic.com (HELO ip2.televic.com) (81.82.194.222)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 12:49:41 +0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.0.56.4) by SRV-VS06.TELEVIC.COM (10.0.0.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.176.0; Tue, 11 May 2010 14:49:38 +0200
Message-ID: <4BE95262.9010906@televic.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 12:49:00 -0000
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Lambrecht?= <J.Lambrecht@televic.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "ecos-devel@ecos.sourceware.org" <ecos-devel@ecos.sourceware.org>
CC: Dries Demeulemeester <D.Demeulemeester@TELEVIC.com>
Subject: SPI flash driver
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact ecos-devel-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <ecos-devel.ecos.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-devel-subscribe@ecos.sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-devel@ecos.sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-devel-help@ecos.sourceware.org>, <http://ecos.sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-devel-owner@ecos.sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2

Hello,

We will develop a SPI flash package for a Numonyx M25P80.
We will base it on 
ecos\packages\devs\flash\atmel\dataflash\current\cdl\devs_flash_atmel_dataflash.cdl.
And make this: ecos\packages\devs\flash\numonyx\spiflash\...

Is it OK to do it this way?

Kind regards,
Jürgen