From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14649 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2010 19:18:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 14640 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Dec 2010 19:18:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (HELO mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com) (81.103.221.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:18:23 +0000 Received: from aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20101211191816.WBAD23441.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:18:16 +0000 Received: from cog.dallaway.org.uk ([213.106.80.48]) by aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.3.00.04.00 201-2196-133-20080908) with ESMTP id <20101211191816.VRYB25656.aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@cog.dallaway.org.uk>; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:18:16 +0000 Received: from cog.dallaway.org.uk (cog.dallaway.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) by cog.dallaway.org.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBBJIDjq009153; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:18:14 GMT Message-ID: <4D03CE75.2050607@dallaway.org.uk> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:18:00 -0000 From: John Dallaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101126) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Larmour CC: Rutger Hofman , eCos developers , Ross Younger Subject: Re: NAND technical review References: <4AC6218C.20407@jifvik.org> <4ACB4B58.2040804@ecoscentric.com> <4ACC0722.9020601@jifvik.org> <4ACCC13F.40009@cs.vu.nl> <4AD69BBE.6070103@jifvik.org> <4AD73386.4030300@cs.vu.nl> <4AD7CD29.1050701@jifvik.org> <4ADC777F.4020506@cs.vu.nl> <4ADD2CAB.4010000@jifvik.org> <4ADDAC7A.1070206@cs.vu.nl> <4ADE679D.1050900@jifvik.org> <4ADEFCFE.9060603@cs.vu.nl> <4AE1B864.1040409@jifvik.org> <4AE1CAD0.4080206@cs.vu.nl> <4AF91026.1060902@jifvik.org> In-Reply-To: <4AF91026.1060902@jifvik.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact ecos-devel-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-devel-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 Hi Jifl On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:03:02 +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > I think I really have to get some comparative measurements on code size > and performance at least. It's tricky when there is no common hardware. > Not even a common architecture (given Jurgen's SAM9260 port isn't > public). And no common chip even then. I think that unless someone is > willing to port one or other to a common piece of hardware, then the > only recourse is the synthetic target. > > I've now built both implementations and run all tests successfully on > synth for both. Now I "just" need to finish porting rwbenchmark.c to (R). Do you see any opportunity to complete this review in the near future? John Dallaway