From: Frank Pagliughi <fpagliughi@mindspring.com>
To: John Dallaway <john@dallaway.org.uk>
Cc: eCos Development List <ecos-devel@ecos.sourceware.org>
Subject: Eagle 100 (Stellaris LM3S6918)
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DFF64B3.9070507@mindspring.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DFA1320.7090500@mindspring.com>
Hi, I was going to grab my SAM3 eval boards from the closet, but to make
space for them on my desk I had to put away the Micromint Eagle 100
board that was sitting there. Then got to thinking the Eagle 100 would
be a really good board for eCos. It's a COTS board around a Stellaris
LM3S6918 with a decent amount of I/O. I'm not an Ethernet guy, so I
probably couldn't get networking going on the board, but could probably
manage the rest of the port pretty quickly.
I looked at the existing Stellaris eCos port for the lm3s8xx, and
thought to make a corresponding lm3s6xxx. But on closer inspection, I
found 19 processors in the 6000 series, all with different memory sizes
and I/O. The only thing they share in common is that they have Ethernet
but not CAN. The 8000 series has Ethernet and CAN. The 5000 series has
CAN and USB. And so on...
So the breakdown of the Stellaris series doesn't exactly mesh with eCos
directory structure, since the chip internals may have more in common
with chips across the different series than within it.
So I'm at a loss on how to proceed. Any advice?
Thanks,
Frank
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-20 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-16 11:16 eCos on AT91SAM9 - call to action John Dallaway
2011-03-16 13:40 ` Grant Edwards
2011-03-16 14:31 ` AW: " Richard Rauch
2011-03-16 17:07 ` Martin Laabs
2011-03-16 18:18 ` John Dallaway
2011-03-16 18:35 ` Michael Bergandi
2011-03-17 10:14 ` Martin Laabs
2011-03-17 13:13 ` John Eigelaar
2011-06-16 13:38 ` Frank Pagliughi
2011-06-16 14:05 ` John Dallaway
2011-06-16 14:16 ` John Eigelaar
2011-06-16 14:27 ` eCos on AT91SAM3 [ was Re: eCos on AT91SAM9 - call to action ] John Dallaway
2011-06-16 14:29 ` eCos on AT91SAM9 - call to action Frank Pagliughi
2011-06-20 15:18 ` Frank Pagliughi [this message]
2011-06-20 16:17 ` Eagle 100 (Stellaris LM3S6918) Stanislav Meduna
2011-06-21 11:05 ` John Dallaway
2011-06-21 16:34 ` Christophe Coutand
2011-06-23 14:31 ` John Dallaway
2011-06-23 16:48 ` Frank Pagliughi
2011-06-23 17:57 ` Christophe Coutand
2011-07-10 20:38 ` Ilija Kocho
2011-07-12 8:57 ` Christophe Coutand
2011-07-13 14:52 ` Ilija Kocho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DFF64B3.9070507@mindspring.com \
--to=fpagliughi@mindspring.com \
--cc=ecos-devel@ecos.sourceware.org \
--cc=john@dallaway.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).