From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29188 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2012 09:39:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 29175 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Mar 2012 09:39:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from tirion.supremecenter202.com (HELO tirion.supremecenter202.com) (209.25.195.243) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:39:17 +0000 Received: from c-32d8e155.355-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se ([85.225.216.50]:46161 helo=[192.168.0.115]) by tirion.supremecenter202.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S5wI8-0001J9-6R; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:39:16 +0000 Message-ID: <4F59CFBE.601@siva.com.mk> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:39:00 -0000 From: Ilija Kocho User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120130 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Schuilenburg CC: eCos developers Subject: Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing References: <4F106345.4080902@siva.com.mk> <4F11574D.9070002@dallaway.org.uk> <4F11AC54.7000902@siva.com.mk> <4F1CB41C.90900@jifvik.org> <4F1DA9A0.5070702@siva.com.mk> <4F1FF5AD.4010901@ecoscentric.com> <4F39887A.5050905@siva.com.mk> <4F50F700.5080902@ecoscentric.com> <4F521D6A.4010500@siva.com.mk> <4F52B2C8.4010809@schuilenburg.org> <4F53C46B.4090502@dallaway.org.uk> <4F53FF0D.80107@ecoscentric.com> <4F574D4A.2090407@ecoscentric.com> <4F58EC32.9070103@ecoscentric.com> In-Reply-To: <4F58EC32.9070103@ecoscentric.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-devel-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-devel-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 Hi Alex Thank you for the update. Regarding EA target (ARM7TDMI) I'm interested whether the perms include thumb code. There's an issue reported by Sergei that would be good to investigate. http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001468#c25 Ilija On 08.03.2012 18:28, Alex Schuilenburg wrote: > Hi > > Just an updated on the status of the Embedded Artists LPC2468-32 board > in anoncvs. > > I have finally got a limping version of RedBoot generated from anoncvs > running on this platform in our test farm, and it does run tests > generated from anoncvs ecos. Unfortunately both ethernet and flash > support for this board appears broken, so lwip and bsd testing is out. > When built with flash and/or ethernet support, RedBoot either hangs on > startup (if flash support is included) or fails to recognise the > ethernet device. > > So the version of RedBoot I finally installed had broken ethernet and no > flash support, but appears to work OK (it has run 4 anoncvs tests in the > farm since I re-released it an hour ago, 3 passed and the other, > realloc, failed but is also fails in eCosPro so no need to investigate > that. I ran tm_basic by hand yesterday built from the default > configuration and that also passed). > > The differences between the eCos and eCosPro BSPs for the Embedded > Artists LPC2468-32 board were too different for the tests and RedBoot > from different source bases to be compatible. However, before I > switched back to anoncvs RedBoot, the test results from eCosPro only > were good. The board had run just over 5500 tests and there were no > regressions with the tests I could find between our GNU tools and eCos > GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 (apart from the additional warnings during the > builds already reported on this list). No bsd configurations were built > before I switched. > > More results later... > -- Alex > > > > > > >