Re: Serial VS Diagnostic interface

["damien millescamps" <damien.millescamps@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Chris Zimman <czimman@bloomberg.com> wrote:
>> Actually as it just inline code. I have already checked it is
>> correctly included. Maybe I should have been more explicit: Is there
>> anything to ensure the HW serial driver is correctly initialized ?
>> Where should pc_serial_lookup() be called in a normal behavior ?
>
> If you can build the serial tests and they pass, you should be in good shape.
> Alternatively, if opening "/dev/ser0" succeeds, you're good to go.
>

opening /dev/ser0 results in an error. Now that I know it should
normally work, I can start to instrument a little bit to find out why
it doesn't work for me.

Thanks,

-- 
Andrew W.

>> I would have another question then, I have noticed that with GCC 4.2.2
>> (which is the one I use), the DEVTAB_ENTRY may be removed if the
>> TABLE_END is declared before adding any additional entry. Is anybody
>> else having the same issue ?
>
> I don't use GCC 4.x having moved to EABI a while ago, so I'm afraid I can't
> offer any advice here.
>
> --Chris
>
>