From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32714 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2011 20:30:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 32706 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2011 20:30:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-qy0-f177.google.com (HELO mail-qy0-f177.google.com) (209.85.216.177) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 20:30:24 +0000 Received: by qyk27 with SMTP id 27so16002049qyk.15 for ; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 12:30:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.249.17 with SMTP id mi17mr18345641qcb.123.1294086622884; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 12:30:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.94.145 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 12:30:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 20:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Package versioning requirements for an epk From: Michael Bergandi To: eCos Developer List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-devel-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-devel-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 Can someone explain/confirm the versioning requirements for an epk package distribution? >From what I can tell, you used to be able to get away with $PACKAGE/current, but it looks like ecosadmin.tcl might have been updated to force proper verisioning. The package I am testing does use 'current' as the version directory in the epk, but the ecosadmin.tcl tool is barking about the package not having a version directory. Thanks, -- Mike