From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11622 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2010 18:17:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 11612 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Nov 2010 18:17:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ew0-f49.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f49.google.com) (209.85.215.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 18:17:22 +0000 Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so1115550ewy.36 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:17:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.9.79 with SMTP id k15mr6936239ebk.27.1290795439809; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:17:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from sg-laptop ([93.85.206.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v56sm1978146eeh.2.2010.11.26.10.17.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:17:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 18:17:00 -0000 From: Sergei Gavrikov To: John Dallaway cc: eCos Developers List Subject: Re: whetstone test In-Reply-To: <4CEFF670.5010505@dallaway.org.uk> Message-ID: References: <4CEFF670.5010505@dallaway.org.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-devel-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-devel-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2 On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, John Dallaway wrote: > Sergei Gavrikov wrote: > > > What is your opinion, Is it a good idea to have `whetstone' test for > > eCos? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whetstone_(benchmark) > > What is the license and copyright situation with this benchmark code? > The source code at: > > http://freespace.virgin.net/roy.longbottom/whets.c > > does not include this information. Hi John, I confess that I have not thought about it :-( Here are just now checked out where it can be (my version) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netlib My mistake. I will look around other implementations. Thank you, Sergei