From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-devel-return-1800-listarch-ecos-devel=sources.redhat.com@ecos.sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 16395 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2011 14:35:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 16197 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Jan 2011 14:35:21 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ew0-f49.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f49.google.com) (209.85.215.49)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:35:17 +0000
Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so6069831ewy.36        for <ecos-devel@ecos.sourceware.org>; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 06:35:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.213.10.12 with SMTP id n12mr334897ebn.66.1294151713726;        Tue, 04 Jan 2011 06:35:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sg-desktop.belvok.com ([86.57.137.251])        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q58sm15713557eeh.15.2011.01.04.06.35.11        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);        Tue, 04 Jan 2011 06:35:12 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:35:00 -0000
From: Sergei Gavrikov <sergei.gavrikov@gmail.com>
To: Michael Bergandi <mbergandi@gmail.com>
cc: eCos Developer List <ecos-devel@ecos.sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Package versioning requirements for an epk
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinfh4QZCuPTYN8=X7Z1YCaob+6nn5r8_kgrBY4c@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1101041617010.29104@sg-desktop.belvok.com>
References: <AANLkTinfh4QZCuPTYN8=X7Z1YCaob+6nn5r8_kgrBY4c@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact ecos-devel-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <ecos-devel.ecos.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-devel-subscribe@ecos.sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-devel@ecos.sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-devel-help@ecos.sourceware.org>, <http://ecos.sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-devel-owner@ecos.sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2

Hi Michael,

On Mon, 3 Jan 2011, Michael Bergandi wrote:
> Can someone explain/confirm the versioning requirements for an epk
> package distribution?

The gory details about eCos 'Package Versioning':
http://ecos.sourceware.org/docs-latest/cdl-guide/package.versions.html

> From what I can tell, you used to be able to get away with
> $PACKAGE/current, but it looks like ecosadmin.tcl might have been
> updated to force proper verisioning. The package I am testing does use
> 'current' as the version directory in the epk, but the ecosadmin.tcl
> tool is barking about the package not having a version directory.

In no way I could reproduce this.

Sergei