From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-devel-return-1972-listarch-ecos-devel=sources.redhat.com@ecos.sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 2072 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2012 21:11:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 2064 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jan 2012 21:11:27 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-bk0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:11:09 +0000
Received: by bkcjg15 with SMTP id jg15so4329935bkc.20        for <ecos-devel@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:11:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.156.17 with SMTP id u17mr5662357bkw.57.1326748266855;        Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:11:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vostro ([178.123.66.178])        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a17sm42098225bkz.7.2012.01.16.13.11.05        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);        Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:11:06 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:11:00 -0000
From: Sergei Gavrikov <sergei.gavrikov@gmail.com>
To: ecos-devel@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Gnutools: consideration for upgrade to GCC 4.6
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1201162153420.3570@vostro>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1201162356040.7527@vostro>
References: <4F106345.4080902@siva.com.mk> <4F11574D.9070002@dallaway.org.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1201141854480.2289@vostro> <jev2q2$s4a$1@dough.gmane.org> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1201152053580.4856@vostro> <jf1f49$i3n$1@dough.gmane.org> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1201162153420.3570@vostro>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact ecos-devel-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <ecos-devel.ecos.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-devel-subscribe@ecos.sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-devel@ecos.sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-devel-help@ecos.sourceware.org>, <http://ecos.sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: ecos-devel-owner@ecos.sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, Sergei Gavrikov wrote:

> I hope I have convinced you and Stano that I did not suggest to "close"
> eCos sources by __ecos__ checks. More that to propagate that built-in
> definition is only a few lines for GCC patch and if that is issue I am
> ready to withdraw my "I like their built-in" :-)

Nobody (me too) said (thought) about:

  http://www.ecoscentric.com/trademark_usage.shtml

AIANL. So, I actually withdraw my "wish" as [eCos] is registered
trademark and anyone would use our patches and abuse the word.

Sergei