From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31716 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2011 13:40:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 31665 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Mar 2011 13:40:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from lo.gmane.org (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:40:09 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzqxH-0000Wm-VH for ecos-devel@sources.redhat.com; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:40:03 +0100 Received: from dsl.comtrol.com ([64.122.56.22]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:40:03 +0100 Received: from grant.b.edwards by dsl.comtrol.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:40:03 +0100 To: ecos-devel@sources.redhat.com From: Grant Edwards Subject: Re: eCos on AT91SAM9 - call to action Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <4D809BF2.6040205@dallaway.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: slrn/pre0.9.9-102 (Linux) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-devel-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-devel-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 On 2011-03-16, John Dallaway wrote: > All > > There has been a lot of delay in getting AT91SAM9 support into the eCos > repository. Far too much delay. I think the best way forward now is to > focus on Evgeniy Dushitov's contribution (port for AT91SAM9263) initially: > > http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000819 > > This seems sensible because: > > a) The patches themselves are well abstracted. > b) Some people are already using these patches as a baseline for > further AT91SAM9 ports. > c) There is support for running this port under QEMU, allowing > wider testing. > > I would like to invite everyone with an interest in AT91SAM9 support > for eCos to add themselves to the CC list for bug 1000819 and > contribute to the review process. I'm in. > Let's make this a community effort. We're using a AT91SAM9 running Linux for one project, but I've been keeping an eye on the eCos port and would be happy to see it move forward. -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Now I'm concentrating at on a specific tank battle gmail.com toward the end of World War II!