From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-discuss-return-24799-listarch-ecos-discuss=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 929 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2003 09:15:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-discuss-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 922 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2003 09:15:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO melelios.dmz.elios-informatique.fr) (194.250.150.132)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 2003 09:15:52 -0000
Received: from figuier ([192.168.7.116]) by melelios.dmz.elios-informatique.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);
	 Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:23:07 +0100
From: "Vincent Catros" <Vincent.Catros@elios-informatique.fr>
To: <ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 09:15:00 -0000
Message-ID: <001601c3b3fe$52041450$7407a8c0@figuier>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Importance: Normal
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Nov 2003 09:23:07.0890 (UTC) FILETIME=[E739DD20:01C3B3FE]
Subject: [ECOS] Is JFFS2 thread-safe?
X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00393.txt.bz2

Hello,

Is JFFS2 thread safe?
Some pieces of code make me think eCos implementation of JFFS2 was
designed to be thread-safe while some other make me think it's not.

Regards.

Vincent


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss