public inbox for ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Kindler" <ukindler@htwm.de>
To: "Nick Garnett" <nickg@ecoscentric.com>
Cc: <ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [ECOS] EDOSK2674 GDB stub problem
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 16:51:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <001f01c39caa$fe9bc2a0$2c79378d@uwepc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m38yn7108l.fsf@miso.calivar.com>

Hello,

> How does this differ from the EDOSK2674 support that is already
> present in the H8/300 HAL?

The new EDOSK2674 port introduces a new architecture - the H8S architecture.
In my opinion this is a new architecture because the CPU architecture
differs from the H8/300 architecture. Mixing both architectures in one eCos
architecture makes the whole think more complex and harder to understand -
in my opinion. Therefore I created the new H8S architecture which cover
H8S/2000 and H8S/2600 CPU s.

The differrent variants are the H8S microprocessors from Renesas (i.e.
H8S/2357 or H8S/2674). The processors differ in the internal modules and
interrupt vector tables and therefore they are axcellent for eCos variant
ports.

The platforms are boards like the EDOSK2674 or the Cetoni MCU/2357 board
(from the company where I do my practical training).

Somme additional differences of the new EDOSK2674 port:
- the context switch code rewritten  (in my opinion the old code is not
completely right - at least i do not unterstand it)
- context switch and exception assembler code are optimised for speed
- the whole source code is well documented
- the CDL files for the configuration utility are more clear
- a lot of minor changes and rewritten code
...

The port is based on the EDOSK 2674 of Yoshinori Sato but some parts
(context switch, trampoline code, VSR-table and ISR tables...) are
completely rewritten.

Status:
- Redboot is running
- GDB debugging works well
- different tests run successfully

Thank you very much for your hint about "maintenance packet r" - this works
well for the EDOSK platform.

Best Regards,

Uwe




-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

      reply	other threads:[~2003-10-27 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-26  9:10 Uwe Kindler
2003-10-27 10:32 ` Nick Garnett
2003-10-27 16:51   ` Uwe Kindler [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='001f01c39caa$fe9bc2a0$2c79378d@uwepc' \
    --to=ukindler@htwm.de \
    --cc=ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=nickg@ecoscentric.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).