From: "Chris Garry" <cgarry@sweeneydesign.co.uk>
To: "Gary Thomas" <gary@mlbassoc.com>
Cc: "eCos Discussion" <ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [ECOS] fis free command
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 11:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003401c3a06b$dae4d300$500ba8c0@jasper> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1142.62.166.230.82.1067673372.squirrel@www.chez-thomas.org>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Thomas" <gary@mlbassoc.com>
To: "Chris Garry" <cgarry@sweeneydesign.co.uk>
Cc: "eCos Discussion" <ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 7:56 AM
Subject: Re: [ECOS] fis free command
> Chris Garry said:
> > I just re-built RedBoot and noticed a small problem with the fis free
> > command. Output from RedBoot below:
> >
> > -- Begin --
> > RedBoot(tm) bootstrap and debug environment [ROM]
> > Non-certified release, version E7T-DBoard - built 16:51:24, Oct 31 2003
> >
> > Copyright (C) 2000, 2001, 2002, Red Hat, Inc.
> >
> > RAM: 0x00000000-0x00080000, [0x00017cc8-0x0006f000] available
> > 0x01900000-0x03900000, [0x01900000-0x03900000] available
> > FLASH: 0x01800000 - 0x01880000, 128 blocks of 0x00001000 bytes each.
> > RedBoot> fis free
> > 0x0183B000 .. 0x0187E000
> > 0x01880000 .. 0x0187FFFF
> > RedBoot>
> > -- End --
> >
> > The last line of output from the fis free command
> > (0x01880000 .. 0x0187FFFF) is bogus since the highest FLASH address
> > is 0x0187FFFF.
> >
> > Has this been seen on other platforms?
>
> No. What does 'fis list' show?
>
RedBoot> fis free
0x0183B000 .. 0x0187E000
0x01880000 .. 0x0187FFFF
RedBoot> fis list
Name FLASH addr Mem addr Length Entry point
(reserved) 0x01800000 0x01800000 0x00010000 0x00000000
RedBoot[post] 0x01810000 0x01810000 0x00020000 0x00000000
support.fpga 0x01830000 0x01900000 0x0000B000 0x01900000
RedBoot config 0x0187E000 0x0187E000 0x00001000 0x00000000
FIS directory 0x0187F000 0x0187F000 0x00001000 0x00000000
RedBoot>
> Note: 'fis free' has recently been changed to believe the values in
> the fis directory. If it is incorrect, then all bets are off. A
> configuration control can be used to restore the previous [dubious]
> behaviour.
I rebuilt RedBoot with CYGDAT_REDBOOT_FIS_MAX_FREE_CHUNKS
disabled and 'fis free' worked correctly. I agree that the new 'fis free'method is
better so I'll have a look at what is going wrong on my target.
Chris
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-01 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-31 18:23 Chris Garry
2003-11-01 7:56 ` Gary Thomas
2003-11-01 11:28 ` Chris Garry [this message]
2003-11-01 13:11 ` Chris Garry
2003-11-01 13:18 ` Gary Thomas
2003-11-04 15:11 ` [ECOS] RE : " David POUTY
2003-11-04 14:02 ` Gary Thomas
2003-11-19 21:32 ` [ECOS] IXP420 Problems Sleepy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='003401c3a06b$dae4d300$500ba8c0@jasper' \
--to=cgarry@sweeneydesign.co.uk \
--cc=ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=gary@mlbassoc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).