From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3799 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2003 11:28:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3790 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2003 11:28:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta01-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.41) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Nov 2003 11:28:04 -0000 Received: from jasper ([81.96.65.2]) by mta01-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with SMTP id <20031101112803.LAED1593.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@jasper>; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 11:28:03 +0000 Message-ID: <003401c3a06b$dae4d300$500ba8c0@jasper> Reply-To: "Chris Garry" From: "Chris Garry" To: "Gary Thomas" Cc: "eCos Discussion" References: <003c01c39fdc$bc7631f0$500ba8c0@jasper> <1142.62.166.230.82.1067673372.squirrel@www.chez-thomas.org> Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 11:28:00 -0000 Organization: Sweeney Design MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: [ECOS] fis free command X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary Thomas" To: "Chris Garry" Cc: "eCos Discussion" Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 7:56 AM Subject: Re: [ECOS] fis free command > Chris Garry said: > > I just re-built RedBoot and noticed a small problem with the fis free > > command. Output from RedBoot below: > > > > -- Begin -- > > RedBoot(tm) bootstrap and debug environment [ROM] > > Non-certified release, version E7T-DBoard - built 16:51:24, Oct 31 2003 > > > > Copyright (C) 2000, 2001, 2002, Red Hat, Inc. > > > > RAM: 0x00000000-0x00080000, [0x00017cc8-0x0006f000] available > > 0x01900000-0x03900000, [0x01900000-0x03900000] available > > FLASH: 0x01800000 - 0x01880000, 128 blocks of 0x00001000 bytes each. > > RedBoot> fis free > > 0x0183B000 .. 0x0187E000 > > 0x01880000 .. 0x0187FFFF > > RedBoot> > > -- End -- > > > > The last line of output from the fis free command > > (0x01880000 .. 0x0187FFFF) is bogus since the highest FLASH address > > is 0x0187FFFF. > > > > Has this been seen on other platforms? > > No. What does 'fis list' show? > RedBoot> fis free 0x0183B000 .. 0x0187E000 0x01880000 .. 0x0187FFFF RedBoot> fis list Name FLASH addr Mem addr Length Entry point (reserved) 0x01800000 0x01800000 0x00010000 0x00000000 RedBoot[post] 0x01810000 0x01810000 0x00020000 0x00000000 support.fpga 0x01830000 0x01900000 0x0000B000 0x01900000 RedBoot config 0x0187E000 0x0187E000 0x00001000 0x00000000 FIS directory 0x0187F000 0x0187F000 0x00001000 0x00000000 RedBoot> > Note: 'fis free' has recently been changed to believe the values in > the fis directory. If it is incorrect, then all bets are off. A > configuration control can be used to restore the previous [dubious] > behaviour. I rebuilt RedBoot with CYGDAT_REDBOOT_FIS_MAX_FREE_CHUNKS disabled and 'fis free' worked correctly. I agree that the new 'fis free'method is better so I'll have a look at what is going wrong on my target. Chris -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss