From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-discuss-return-24404-listarch-ecos-discuss=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 25972 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2003 18:23:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-discuss-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 25965 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2003 18:23:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta06-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.46)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Oct 2003 18:23:39 -0000
Received: from jasper ([81.96.65.2]) by mta06-svc.ntlworld.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with SMTP
          id <20031031182333.NKNY25471.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@jasper>
          for <ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>;
          Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:23:34 +0000
Message-ID: <003c01c39fdc$bc7631f0$500ba8c0@jasper>
Reply-To: "Chris Garry" <cgarry@sweeneydesign.co.uk>
From: "Chris Garry" <cgarry@sweeneydesign.co.uk>
To: "eCos Discussion" <ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:23:00 -0000
Organization: Sweeney Design
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Subject: [ECOS] fis free command
X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00513.txt.bz2

I just re-built RedBoot and noticed a small problem with the fis free
command. Output from RedBoot below:

-- Begin -- 
RedBoot(tm) bootstrap and debug environment [ROM]
Non-certified release, version E7T-DBoard - built 16:51:24, Oct 31 2003

Copyright (C) 2000, 2001, 2002, Red Hat, Inc.

RAM: 0x00000000-0x00080000, [0x00017cc8-0x0006f000] available
     0x01900000-0x03900000, [0x01900000-0x03900000] available
FLASH: 0x01800000 - 0x01880000, 128 blocks of 0x00001000 bytes each.
RedBoot> fis free
  0x0183B000 .. 0x0187E000
  0x01880000 .. 0x0187FFFF
RedBoot>
-- End --

The last line of output from the fis free command
(0x01880000 .. 0x0187FFFF) is bogus since the highest FLASH address
is 0x0187FFFF.

Has this been seen on other platforms?

--
Chris

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss