public inbox for ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "James Kahkoska" <jkahkoska@wire-less-inc.com>
To: <ecos-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com>
Subject: [ECOS] assertion error in stdio
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 14:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <007c01bfeab5$4adc6080$01b5a8c0@JamesLaptop> (raw)

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2254 bytes --]

I am having a problem with eCos when I turn on 
asserts in eCos. I thought everything I/O related was working ok but when I 
turn on assertions, I get the following assertion error:
 
ASSERT FAIL: 
stream.cxx          [  79] 
Cyg_StdioStream::Cyg_StdioStream() Attempt to open invalid 
device!
 
The call stack looks 
like hal_misc.c\cyg_hal_invoke_constructors() Line #92 (0x0001C930)   
stdout.cxx\global constructors keyed to 50000.cyg_libc_stdio_stdout() Line #90 
(0x00020240)     
stdiofiles.inl\__static_initialization_and_destruction_0() Line #83 
(0x000200DC)       
stream.cxx\Cyg_StdioStream::Cyg_StdioStream(void *, Cyg_StdioStream::OpenMode, 
bool, bool, int, unsigned int, unsigned char *)() Line #82 
(0x00020328)         
buffer.cxx\cyg_assert_fail() Line #741 (0x0001DE84)
 
It appears the Cyg_StdioStream::Cyg_StdioStream 
contructor is being passed a NULL for the device and the assertion catches 
that. I went further into the code and this originates in stdout.cxx 
cyg_libc_stdio_stdout() Line #90
 
  // And here's an instance of the class just 
to make the code run   static cyg_libc_dummy_stdout_init_class 
cyg_libc_dummy_stdout_init    
                                       
CYG_INIT_PRIORITY(LIBC)
 
The constructor ends up calling calling  

 
  Cyg_libc_stdio_files::set_file_stream( fd_t 
fd, Cyg_StdioStream *stream )
 
which invokes the 
Cyg_StdioStream::Cyg_StdioStream(cyg_io_handle_t dev, constructor with a null 
device.      CYG_CHECK_DATA_PTR(dev, "Attempt to open 
invalid device!");
 
Without asserts enabled my printf's to stdout seem 
to work fine. I am not sure about this dummy class and single static instance 
that causes the assertion to fail. The comment is my only clue to it's 
existence:
 
// This is a dummy class just so we can execute 
arbitrary code when // stdout is requested
 
Any ideas as to why I need this dummy class or why 
it might be blowing up?
 
Thanks, James
 
 
James Kahkoska jkahkoska@wire-less-inc.com 719-528-8885 
x104

             reply	other threads:[~2000-07-10 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-07-10 14:22 James Kahkoska [this message]
2000-07-11  6:37 ` Bart Veer
2000-07-11  6:43   ` Dave Airlie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='007c01bfeab5$4adc6080$01b5a8c0@JamesLaptop' \
    --to=jkahkoska@wire-less-inc.com \
    --cc=ecos-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).