From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5177 invoked by alias); 10 May 2006 13:15:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 5169 invoked by uid 22791); 10 May 2006 13:15:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from Unknown (HELO netic.com) (66.28.185.252) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:14:56 +0000 Received: from piii550 (203-206-167-254.perm.iinet.net.au [203.206.167.254]) by netic.com (8.12.10/8.11.0) with ESMTP id k4ADElc0024679 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:14:49 -0600 Reply-To: From: "Laurie Gellatly" To: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: <00b301c67433$b8476a80$0101010a@netic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: <4461E29F.1030705@webdyn.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [ECOS] Choice of Web Servers X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2 Hi All, I'm new to the list. Still selecting parts for my project. I've been looking for a capable web server (IPv4/6, HTTPS, DAA, CGI, threads...) and GoAhead seems to fit except for the logo on the end product licensing requirement which rules it out. The standard server unfortunately lacks required features and I searched through past posts and found 'seminole'. Google found 'shttpd' which also looks promising but there appears to be some level of porting required. Anyone suggest an alternative and/or provide comments on these last two? Cheers ...Laurie:{) -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss