From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15292 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2004 16:41:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 15214 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2004 16:41:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.marakicorp.com) (209.20.251.202) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 Jun 2004 16:41:07 -0000 Received: from krishnagdev ([192.168.1.103]) by mail.marakicorp.com (Merak 6.2.1) with SMTP id JGA37966; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 09:41:07 -0700 Message-ID: <00bc01c44fd2$cf4b6dd0$6701a8c0@marakicorp.com> From: "Krishna Ganugapati" To: "Mark Salter" , Cc: References: <20040608184330.67693.qmail@web50807.mail.yahoo.com> <20040608192009.422807907B@deneb.localdomain> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:41:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [ECOS] Can we add the intel npe package to the latest sources? (was Re: [ECOS] Problems programming Intel's J3 Stratoflash chip) X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00114.txt.bz2 Hello, I'm using the latest cvs sources and building redboot for a custom ixp425 board. We're using the npes on the ixp425 and have downloaded the npe packages from Intel. On reading the instructions from Intel it says that we need to download the sources from Redhat(which includes fixes for block lock status bits the StrataFlash 28F128J3(C)). Once that is done, we're supposed to just add the npe package to these sources using ecosadmin.tcl. My questions: 1)I'd like to use the latest cvs sources - I'm integrating some of the pci ide support and other stuff. Can I just add the npe package directly to the cvs sources and work off of that? Has anyone done this and can vouch for the npe stuff working off their cvs built Redboot images? Note: I was successfully able to add the npe package direct to my anonymous cvs tree..(but that doesn't necessarily mean that the two are compatible) 2)I've seen a few postings (one from Mark Salter saying that the block lock status bits fix for the J3C will be checked in to the latest sources - has this been done? I have ye to ssync my source tree - it has been a few months now and was wondering whether this has been done? 3) When Intel says the Redboot do they mean the cvs sources... Thanks! Krishna ------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Salter" To: Cc: Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 12:20 PM Subject: Re: [ECOS] Problems programming Intel's J3 Stratoflash chip. > >>>>> Louis Gagne writes: > > > Intel has recently bumped up their revision of the > > 128Mbit J3 Stratoflash chip (28F128J3). My Redboot > > code handled the J3A version just fine, but with the > > J3C version I get errors programming it. The error is > > 0x92. This error persists even if I unlock the > > sectors before trying to program the chip. > > > Has anyone else run into this issue? If so, were you > > able to overcome the problem? How did you resolve it? > > This should have been fixed in CVS with this (if its the bug > I'm thinking of): > > 2003-10-29 Jonathan Larmour > > * src/flash_unlock_block.c (flash_unlock_block): test lock bit > explicitly - newer flash parts use the reserved bits in the > returned data. > > --Mark > > > > -- > Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos > and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss > -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss