public inbox for ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Thomas <gary@chez-thomas.org>
To: peter_ku <peter_ku@issc.com.tw>
Cc: 'eCos Discussion' <ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [ECOS]something unclear about CVS
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 05:34:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1024921854.20514.1.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001c21b20$43946fa0$790114ac@issc.com.tw>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2986 bytes --]

On Sun, 2002-06-23 at 19:41, peter_ku wrote:
> Hello Gary,
> 
> The document says
> 
> cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/ecos -z 6 co -P ecos
> cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/ecos -z 6 co -P net
> cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/ecos -z 6 co -P snmp
> 
> After I execute the first step: cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/ecos -z 6 co -P ecos
> I found everything is in my installed folder, include package/net and package/net/snmp , it looks like NET and SNMP has already installed.
> Why I still execute the next two step? 
> for example : I see cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/ecos -z 6 co -P snmp still update the SNMP. 
> 
> that is my question , thank you for your help.
> 

No problem, it's just old documentation.  With the v2.0(alpha), we've
merged in the "net" and "snmp" packages with the mainline sources.

You're probably set to go.

> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com
> [mailto:ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com]On Behalf Of Gary Thomas
> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 8:32 PM
> To: peter_ku
> Cc: 'eCos Discussion'
> Subject: Re: [ECOS]something unclear about CVS
> 
> 
> On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 02:50, peter_ku wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I should use the CVS earlier!! thanks a lot, Gary.
> > After I use CVS , I have something unclear.
> > 
> > 1. ecos / net /  snmp ??
> >  After I execute "cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/ecos -z 6 co -P ecos"
> > , there is a /pckages/net folder in my directly
> > 
> > Why should I continue to execute "cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/ecos -z 6 co -P ecos" ? I see this still update the /packages/net.
> > what is the difference between this two net?
> > 
> 
> Your question isn't very clear (I don't see any difference between the
> two commands).  The important thing is to let CVS update the whole tree,
> which is significant - some 6000 files!. 
> 
> > 2. After all update finished (ecos, net , snmp), how do I know which version I use currently? Use the ConfigTool, the version is always "current"
> > I know I can check ChangeLog, but each sub folder have their own ChangeLog file, is that the only way to check?
> 
> Version "numbers" are a bit confusing here.  eCos was designed to have
> stabilized "releases" in which the "current" directories were renamed
> to indicate the version.   In this way, a single source tree could 
> contain multiple versions of eCos.  However, at this time, the only
> version available is the most current (hence the name) from CVS.
> 
> You can get version and history information for any file in the 
> repository using CVS commands.  Just try this on a file:
>   % cvs log <file>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
> and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
> 


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2002-06-24 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-06-19  7:56 [ECOS] RE: libsupc++.a Koeller, T.
2002-06-20  0:43 ` [ECOS] libsupc++.a Martin Buck
2002-06-20  3:15   ` [ECOS] Still have some problem about install net-1_01b1.epk peter_ku
2002-06-20  5:35     ` Gary Thomas
2002-06-22  5:24       ` [ECOS]something unclear about CVS peter_ku
2002-06-22 18:03         ` Gary Thomas
2002-06-24  2:08           ` peter_ku
2002-06-24  5:34             ` Gary Thomas [this message]
2002-06-26  7:58               ` peter_ku
2002-06-26  8:17                 ` Jani Monoses

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1024921854.20514.1.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org \
    --to=gary@chez-thomas.org \
    --cc=ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=peter_ku@issc.com.tw \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).