From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20656 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2003 16:43:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20635 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2003 16:43:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.broadpark.no) (217.13.4.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Oct 2003 16:43:17 -0000 Received: from famine (217-13-20-38.dd.nextgentel.com [217.13.20.38]) by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56EA078F2F; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 18:43:16 +0200 (MEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D8yvind?= Harboe To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com Cc: dvrabel@arcom.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Organization: Zylin AS Message-Id: <1065544995.6274.3.camel@famine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 16:43:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [ECOS] Stress testing JFFS2 X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2 >Also, in a previous message you mentioned setting the number of >required free blocks to zero. Was this done in this test? No. >If so then >(as I >understand it) JFFS2 will not work as there are no free blocks >for GCing so old nodes cannot be deleted thus you have no free flash >left. Actually, when I set required number of free blocks to zero, my test case does a 100k iterations without problems. Occasionally I see a short pause when presumably it does garbage collection. For me setting required number of free blocks to zero has been a cureall. Øyvind -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss