From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26116 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2003 07:37:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26107 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2003 07:37:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.broadpark.no) (217.13.4.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Oct 2003 07:37:24 -0000 Received: from famine (217-13-20-38.dd.nextgentel.com [217.13.20.38]) by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895DC7A392; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 09:37:23 +0200 (MEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D8yvind?= Harboe To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com, thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Organization: Zylin AS Message-Id: <1065598642.12197.6.camel@famine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 07:37:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [ECOS] Stress testing JFFS2 X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00126.txt.bz2 >What I found out so far is that the memory does not seem to be lost >permanently, if the file system is unmounted, it's all there again. I'd > be delighted if someone came up with a solution! Daved Woodhouse seems to be referring to this problem in this thread: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2003-August/008363.html Øyvind -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss