From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4864 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2003 09:56:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4857 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2003 09:56:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hermes.chez-thomas.org) (63.225.98.241) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Oct 2003 09:56:36 -0000 Received: by hermes.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 2000) id BF10E50DF7D; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 03:56:35 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBC350DDB6; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 03:56:34 -0600 (MDT) From: Gary Thomas To: b8944004 Cc: eCos Discussion In-Reply-To: <20031008061017.M70557@stmail.cgu.edu.tw> References: <20031008061017.M70557@stmail.cgu.edu.tw> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: MLB Associates Message-Id: <1065606994.1884.592.camel@hermes> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 09:56:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_XIMIAN autolearn=ham version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) Subject: Re: [ECOS] What is different between the satrtup mode "RAM" and "COMPAQ"? X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00133.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 00:15, b8944004 wrote: > What is different between the satrtup mode "RAM" and "COMPAQ"? > My platform is IPAQ. > COMPAQ mode assumes that the hardware memory map was left as the COMPAQ boot loader sets things up. RAM mode assumes that RedBoot has already remapped memory to match the eCos model. -- Gary Thomas MLB Associates -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss