From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31798 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2003 15:46:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31773 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2003 15:46:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lapdancer.baythorne.internal) (193.237.130.41) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Nov 2003 15:46:16 -0000 Received: from lapdancer.baythorne.internal ([127.0.0.1]) by lapdancer.baythorne.internal with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1AQ7IS-00043Z-MR; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 15:46:12 +0000 From: David Woodhouse To: Gary Thomas Cc: Vincent Catros , ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <33052.63.173.215.14.1070117670.squirrel@www.chez-thomas.org> References: <000001c3b4c7$023894e0$7407a8c0@figuier> <1070018075.10048.29.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <1070018876.10048.35.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <1070035746.13188.17.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <33052.63.173.215.14.1070117670.squirrel@www.chez-thomas.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1070120772.15555.1.camel@lapdancer.baythorne.internal> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 15:46:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [ECOS] RE : [ECOS] Is JFFS2 thread-safe? X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00434.txt.bz2 On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 07:54 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: > What do you mean? If the scheduler lock is non-zero, then no > scheduling takes place (certainly in the single processor case) Er, but what causes the scheduler lock to become non-zero when I lock a spinlock? -- dwmw2 -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss