From: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
To: Bujji <rkiran@ipr.res.in>
Cc: Michael Anburaj <embeddedeng@hotmail.com>,
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [ECOS] arm based evaluaton board (fwd)
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1071344857.1942.382.camel@hermes> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10312131649560.28752-100000@sun3.plasma.ernet.in>
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 14:50, Bujji wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is Intel Xscale different from ARM??
>
Intel Xscale is the new generation of StrongARM which is an ARM variant.
It *is* different in some details, but still basically an ARM.
> thanku all
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Michael Anburaj wrote:
>
> > Hi Ravi,
> >
> > Samsung boards are real good. So is Atmel's. It all depends on the speed &
> > peripheral needs. If you just need a minimal ARM board, then go for the
> > ARM's Eval7T (which has a Samsung's 7TDMI), or the Atmel's EB40.
> >
> > The ARM9's can run up to 200MHz & the samsung's SMDK 2410 board is a good
> > one for the price.
> >
> > cheers,
> > -Mike.
> >
> >
> > >From: Bujji <rkiran@ipr.res.in>
> > >To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
> > >Subject: Re: [ECOS] arm based evaluaton board (fwd)
> > >Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:43:13 -0500 (GMT)
> > >
> > >
> > >Hi all,
> > >
> > >sorry for incomplete info.
> > >we want to have hands on ARM based processor.
> > >after that we want to compare ARM with POWERPC for our application ,
> > >whichis a feedback control system of looptime 100us.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Shobhan Ayyadevara wrote:
> > >
> > > > it is depend upon the application that you are going to develop on it ??
> > > >
> > > > What is the application that you are going to develop on that ??
> > > >
> > > > Shobhan
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Bujji" <rkiran@ipr.res.in>
> > > > Cc: <ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 3:20 AM
> > > > Subject: [ECOS] arm based evaluaton board
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > we are planning to buy a ARM based evaluation board supported by Ecos.
> > > > > could somebody suggest me a good Evaluation board.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards and Thanks
> > > >
> > >
> > >Regards and Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > **********************************
> > > M.RAVI KIRAN
> > > Engineer-SC
> > > SST-1 Operation and Control Group
> > > Institute for Plasma Research
> > > Bhat village,Nr.Indira Bridge
> > > Gandhinagar(Gujarat)-382428.
> > > INDIA
> > > Phone : +91-079-3969001-15
> > > ext: 259/412/316
> > > Fax : +91-079-3969017
> > > Mail : rkiran@ipr.res.in
> > > **********************************
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
> > >and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
> > >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get holiday tips for festive fun.
> > http://special.msn.com/network/happyholidays.armx
> >
>
> Regards and Thanks
>
>
> **********************************
> M.RAVI KIRAN
> Engineer-SC
> SST-1 Operation and Control Group
> Institute for Plasma Research
> Bhat village,Nr.Indira Bridge
> Gandhinagar(Gujarat)-382428.
> INDIA
> Phone : +91-079-3969001-15
> ext: 259/412/316
> Fax : +91-079-3969017
> Mail : rkiran@ipr.res.in
> **********************************
--
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
MLB Associates
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-13 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-10 16:30 Michael Anburaj
2003-12-13 19:47 ` Bujji
2003-12-14 20:51 ` Gary Thomas [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-10 8:21 Bujji
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1071344857.1942.382.camel@hermes \
--to=gary@mlbassoc.com \
--cc=ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=embeddedeng@hotmail.com \
--cc=rkiran@ipr.res.in \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).