From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9932 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2005 06:22:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9924 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2005 06:22:01 -0000 Received: from asav1.lyse.net (HELO asav1.lyse.net) (213.167.96.68) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 06:22:01 +0000 Received: from asav1.lyse.net (asav1.lyse.net [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.lyse.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0D4902CC; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 08:17:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail1.lyse.net (unknown [192.168.42.2])by asav1.lyse.net (Postfix) with ESMTPid B8FA0902CB; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 08:17:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [84.234.138.230] (helo=[192.168.0.193])by mail1.lyse.net with smtp (Exim 4.34)id 1DiRGf-0006Nt-HJ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 08:20:53 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D8yvind?= Harboe To: Bart Veer Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20050613185448.1D92265C057@smtp.ecoscentric.com> References: <1118229873.11654.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050611134933.7C2CA65C057@smtp.ecoscentric.com> <1118685436.31409.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050613185448.1D92265C057@smtp.ecoscentric.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 06:22:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1118816539.11778.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-imss-version: 2.028 X-imss-result: Passed X-imss-scores: Clean:37.27399 C:2 M:3 S:5 R:5 X-imss-settings: Baseline:2 C:1 M:1 S:1 R:1 (0.1500 0.1500) Subject: Re: [ECOS] hal_delay_us() patch to at91_misc + multithreading X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00103.txt.bz2 [lots of valid objections to my suggested HAL_DELAY_US() implementation deleted] There is one issue with making HAL_DELAY_US() compulsory that has not been discussed: how likely is it to get a consensus to do so? My thinking was that a default implementation of HAL_DELAY_US() would improve that chances of getting a consensus.=20 The crummy HAL_DELAY_US() I suggested scored on this point. It would work correctly on almost any platform. --=20 =D8yvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss