From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15101 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2005 18:06:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 15094 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jul 2005 18:06:50 -0000 Received: from sta-206-168-96-204.rockynet.com (HELO hermes.chez-thomas.org) (206.168.96.204) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:06:50 +0000 Received: by hermes.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 2000) id B1CDA10043D; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:05:35 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA34100438; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:05:31 -0600 (MDT) From: Gary Thomas To: paape@Hi-Techniques.com Cc: eCos Discussion In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:06:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1121969131.12697.167.camel@hermes> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [ECOS] bsd stack buffering X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00230.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 12:57 -0500, paape@Hi-Techniques.com wrote: > Hello, > I would like to significantly increase the 256KB limit for socket buffering. > Does anyone know of: 1.) anything that would preclude me from doing this, > whether in the stack or eCos itself? 2.) any other parameter[s] that would > need to be modified in conjuction with this, other than the initial stack > memory allocation? Just increase CYGPKG_NET_MEM_USAGE and it should work. You might also increase CYGPKG_NET_MAXSOCKETS -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss