From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25934 invoked by alias); 23 May 2013 10:29:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 25923 invoked by uid 89); 23 May 2013 10:29:26 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from sam.nabble.com (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 May 2013 10:29:23 +0000 Received: from tom.nabble.com ([192.168.236.105]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UfSlu-0007Qh-EA for ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 03:29:22 -0700 Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 10:29:00 -0000 From: "yusuf.husainy" To: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org Message-ID: <1369304962433-233026.post@n7.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <519DD845.2010805@siva.com.mk> References: <1369294035586-233012.post@n7.nabble.com> <519DD845.2010805@siva.com.mk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [ECOS] Re: ecos configuration for LPC1769 X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2 Hi Ilija Kocho, Thanks for the timely reply, i appreciate it. I will go through the documentation you have suggested. Also, as you said, LPC17xx porting will be easy, as it is supported, but the specific processor variant for LPC1769 is not supported. I was going through the lpc1766stk_misc.c file in the HAL of LPC17xx, and over there most of the macros used were 17xx type. Also, in the files, mlt_cortexm_lpc1766_rom.h and mlt_cortexm_lpc1766_rom.c, i just edited the end address of the flash to 0x00080000(512KB) from 0x00040000(256KB), as LPC1769 has 512KB flash compared to LPC1766, which has 256KB flash, rest all features are same, except also for the MAX clk hz(120MHz for 1769 and 100MHz for 1766), but I am using 20MHz for my board design, so I don't think that would be a problem. I would appreciate your comments in this regard also. Thanks and Regards, Yusuf Husainy. -- View this message in context: http://sourceware-org.1504.n7.nabble.com/ecos-configuration-for-LPC1769-tp233012p233026.html Sent from the Sourceware - ecos-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss