From: Daniel Zebralla <daniel.zebralla@zebralla-it.de>
To: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org
Subject: [ECOS] Re: umount leaks /dev/flash/ device slots
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:15:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1384424019410-250770.post@n7.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AA0E0BF.4010405@meduna.org>
Though this posting is from 2009, I just ran into the same problem recently.
We use a patched JFFS2 file system in eCos on a Freescale MPC5668 processor.
The umount-function there has not released the flash i/o handles, resulting
in exactly the described problem: After CYGNUM_IO_FLASH_BLOCK_DEVICES
remounts, mount failed because no flash handles were available any longer.
I now added the call to flashiodev_set_config to the umount function as
follows:
if (--n_fs_mounted == 0) {
jffs2_destroy_slab_caches();
jffs2_compressors_exit();
// Release the flash device i/o handler
flashiodev_set_config(
jffs2_sb->s_dev,
CYG_IO_SET_CONFIG_CLOSE,
(void*) NULL,
0);
}
This results in the 'fs-test3.c' test case provided with eCos to run
smoothly, re-mounting lots of times.
I wonder however:
1) The documentation "Using FLASH I/O devices" [1] speaks of the function
'cyg_io_setconfig' instead of 'flashiodev_set_config'. I haven't found
anything regarding this function name in my eCos base package besides two
occurrences in a manual file. Does this function even exist inside the code?
2) The function 'flashiodev_set_config' is statically declared inside
'flashiodev.c'. I had to mess up the code a bit to get this function to be
known inside the jffs2-source file as well. Wouldn't it make more sense if
functions like this would be declared inside a header file which can easily
be included elsewhere?
Regards
- Daniel
[1] http://ecos.sourceware.org/docs-3.0/ref/ecos-flash-iodevice-usage.html
--
View this message in context: http://sourceware-org.1504.n7.nabble.com/umount-leaks-dev-flash-device-slots-tp195700p250770.html
Sent from the Sourceware - ecos-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-14 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-04 9:41 [ECOS] " Stanislav Meduna
2009-09-04 10:11 ` [ECOS] CPULoad on i386 Jim Bradleigh
2009-09-04 15:09 ` Jim Bradleigh
2013-11-14 10:15 ` Daniel Zebralla [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1384424019410-250770.post@n7.nabble.com \
--to=daniel.zebralla@zebralla-it.de \
--cc=ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).