From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jesper Skov <jskov@redhat.com>
To: Grant Edwards <grante@visi.com>
Cc: Jesper Skov <jskov@redhat.com>, ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [ECOS] #error " no RESET_ENTRY"  ??
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:08:00 -0000
Message-id: <14940.38552.654662.820570@thinktwice.zoftcorp.dk>
References: <20010109165157.A16129@visi.com> <otpuhv969a.fsf@thinktwice.zoftcorp.dk> <20010110093636.A23362@visi.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-01/msg00163.html

>>>>> "Grant" == Grant Edwards <grante@visi.com> writes:


>> After I complete my changes, IO will _always_ happen via the
>> virtual vector table. Your option will be to claim those vectors in
>> the RAM application (thus using serial IO routines in the
>> application) or leave them in the ROM monitor's control (using
>> serial IO routines in ROM/flash).

Grant> IOW, CYGSEM_HAL_VIRTUAL_VECTOR_DIAG will always be true, and
Grant> one controls which way things work with
Grant> CYGPRI_HAL_IMPLEMENTS_IF_SERVICES?

Yes, something like that. Except there'll be new options to increase
the configuration granularity.

Jesper