From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Veer To: ecos-discuss@cygnus.com Subject: [ECOS] Re: CPU Ports for eCos Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 07:10:00 -0000 Message-id: <199904281409.PAA09887@sheesh.cygnus.co.uk> References: <111A03061F70D111B11F006097BE207A538F5E@mail.waccess.com> <111A03061F70D111B11F006097BE207A538F5E@mail.waccess.com> <199904281342.PAA19288@link.csem.ch> <199904281342.PAA19288@link.csem.ch> X-SW-Source: 1999-04/msg00035.html >>>>> "Fernando" == Fernando D Mato Mira writes: Fernando> Somebody (not me) should get the sources for the old Fernando> Analog Devices compiler and put their backend stuff into Fernando> egcs. Their new compiler is not gcc-based and is pretty Fernando> broken. It's really irritating, and motivates me to Fernando> specify TI whenever possible. Probably true, if there are no problems with copyright assignments etc. For example the gcc port to the MC68HC11 could not be merged because of assignment problems. Anybody interested in doing this should contact the egcs maintainers, http://egcs.cygnus.com , to find out what would be involved. A Cygnus port of eCos to this architecture is not currently under consideration, so it is unlikely that we will do this work any time soon. Fernando> BTW, the ReplyTo of messages should be ecos-discuss, not Fernando> the author. Not necessarily, http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html gives a different opinion. Bart Veer // eCos net maintainer