From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Phung Te Ha <phungte@orchid.good.com>
To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [ECOS] CYGIMP_KERNEL_COUNTERS_SORT_LIST
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 18:33:00 -0000
Message-id: <200108070131.f771Veh11619@orchid.good.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00181.html

Hi everyone,

Would like to have your idea on the following:

The code in kernel/.../clock.cxx under #ifdef CYGIMP_KERNEL_COUNTERS_SORT_LIST is off 
in the normal case and my test program below works OK. 

Now if I turn this code on by defining CYGIMP_KERNEL_COUNTERS_SORT_LIST, the thread
with small delay seems to be forgotten from the list... 
The behavior is the same on a edb7xxx and  on linux system.

Thanks for your idea.

Phungte

TEST PROGRAM:
#include <cyg/kernel/kapi.h>

#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
#include <stdlib.h>


char stack[4096];
cyg_thread thread_s;
cyg_handle_t simple_threadA;

char stack2[4096];
cyg_thread thread_x;
cyg_handle_t simple_threadB;

void simple_program(cyg_addrword_t data)
{
    printf("Beginning threadA\n");


    for (;;) {
        cyg_thread_delay(data);
        printf(">>>>>>>>>.%d.\n", data);
    }
}

void cyg_user_start(void)
{

    cyg_thread_create(20, simple_program, (cyg_addrword_t) 400,
                      "Thread A", (void *) &stack, 4096,
                      &simple_threadA, &thread_s);
    cyg_thread_resume(simple_threadA);

    cyg_thread_create(20, simple_program, (cyg_addrword_t) 100,
                      "Thread B", (void *) &stack2, 4096,
                      &simple_threadB, &thread_x);
    cyg_thread_resume(simple_threadB);
}


OUTPUT:
Starting program: /home/phungte/good/mobi/ecos/development/tick/obj.linux/tickTest 
Beginning threadA
Beginning threadA
>>>>>>>>>.100.
>>>>>>>>>.100.
>>>>>>>>>.100.
>>>>>>>>>.400.
>>>>>>>>>.400.
>>>>>>>>>.400.
>>>>>>>>>.400.
...