From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19991 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2002 13:31:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19875 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2002 13:31:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO iv.ro) (194.105.28.94) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Jun 2002 13:31:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 13466 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2002 15:30:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cow) (192.168.1.4) by 192.168.1.1 with SMTP; 26 Jun 2002 15:30:14 -0000 Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 08:17:00 -0000 From: Jani Monoses To: "peter_ku" Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20020626163138.6fe7130d.jani@iv.ro> In-Reply-To: <000001c21d11$8fc81820$790114ac@issc.com.tw> References: <1024921854.20514.1.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> <000001c21d11$8fc81820$790114ac@issc.com.tw> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [ECOS]something unclear about CVS X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00472.txt.bz2 > Hello, > > 1. cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/ecos -z 6 co -P ecos > > 2. cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/ecos -z 6 co -r last-rhepl -P ecos > > what is the difference between these two? > > If I update the code using first item, am I use ecos2.0 now? yes the first is for ecos2.0 alpha while the second is for the latest non-GPL version -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss