From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-discuss-return-15636-listarch-ecos-discuss=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 14633 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2002 05:07:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-discuss-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 14602 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2002 05:07:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sina.com) (202.108.35.253)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Jul 2002 05:07:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 24668 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2002 04:59:35 -0000
Message-ID: <20020706045935.24667.qmail@sina.com>
From: zhlg_shuhan <zhlg_shuhan@sina.com>
To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 22:07:00 -0000
X-Priority: 3
Subject: [ECOS] why STACK_FRAME_PPC_SIZE was defined 56?
X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00057.txt.bz2

hi,all!
   i have browsed eABI summary,but failed to find its stack frame size should be 56 in ppc processor.eABI summary only hints rough its content.
could you help me?

regards!

                                                     zhlg
______________________________________

===================================================================
ÐÂÀËÃâ·Ñµç×ÓÓÊÏä (http://mail.sina.com.cn)
ÐÂÀË·ÖÀàÐÅÏ¢£º¶þÊÖÊг¡×ßÒ»×ߣ¬¸Ã³öÊÖʱ¾Í³öÊÖ£¡ (http://classad.sina.com.cn/2shou/)

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss