From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6207 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2002 01:38:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6184 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2002 01:38:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jul 2002 01:38:22 -0000 Received: from deneb.localdomain (chunnel.redhat.com [172.16.48.220] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g691Ru902653; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 21:27:56 -0400 Received: (from msalter@localhost) by deneb.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g691aOf18638; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 21:36:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 18:38:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200207090136.g691aOf18638@deneb.localdomain> From: Mark Salter To: grante@visi.com CC: gary@chez-thomas.org, ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20020708183316.A31984@visi.com> (message from Grant Edwards on Mon, 8 Jul 2002 18:33:20 -0500) References: <20020708181640.A31952@visi.com> <1026170335.15020.1426.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> <20020708183316.A31984@visi.com> Subject: Re: [ECOS] TCP stack not delaying/piggybacking ACKs? X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 >>>>> Grant Edwards writes: > I've been browsing around the sources and haven't quite figured > out how it's supposed to work. I do have the TCP_NODELAY flag > set on the socket, but I don't know if that has anything to do > with it. That is easy enough to test. Try turning it off. TCP_NODELAY tells the stack to send ACKs without waiting a bit for a possible packet to piggyback on. --Mark -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss