From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4294 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2002 12:39:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3795 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2002 12:39:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO iv.ro) (194.105.28.94) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Jul 2002 12:39:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 20689 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2002 14:36:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cow) (192.168.1.4) by 192.168.1.1 with SMTP; 10 Jul 2002 14:36:48 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 05:39:00 -0000 From: Jani Monoses To: Gary Thomas Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20020710153837.2b5089d1.jani@iv.ro> In-Reply-To: <1026303659.15020.5093.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> References: <20020710140837.6eb896b4.jani@iv.ro> <1026303659.15020.5093.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [ECOS] new_net compilation failure X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00123.txt.bz2 > So, why didn't I get any errors on these? It seems that different > compilers don't behave the same. Maybe some installations of gcc have different paths for sys/params.h ????? I don't know. -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss