From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29416 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2002 08:05:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29408 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2002 08:05:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rubicon.hasler.ascom.ch) (139.79.129.1) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Jul 2002 08:05:36 -0000 Received: from eiger.ma.tech.ascom.ch (eiger.ma.tech.ascom.ch [139.79.100.1]) by rubicon.hasler.ascom.ch (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g6V85XI03962; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:05:33 +0200 (MEST) Received: from biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch ([139.79.100.27]) by eiger.ma.tech.ascom.ch with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 17ZoU7-0007Jr-00; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:05:31 +0200 Received: by biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id KAA03499; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:05:29 +0200 Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 01:05:00 -0000 From: Andrew Lunn To: NavEcos Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <20020731080529.GD3392@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> Mail-Followup-To: NavEcos , ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com References: <02073022245703.00917@c1830598-a> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <02073022245703.00917@c1830598-a> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Filter-Version: 1.6 (rubicon) Subject: Re: [ECOS] simple eCos profiler X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00469.txt.bz2 Hi Rich. This looks similar to the one i wrote a few years ago for eCos. Its sitting in the ecos-discuss archive somewhere. That was for the EBSA285, but could be easily ported to other targets. I find a profiler useful at times, so it would be good to get something incorporated. > I would like to get at least hooks for this into the main tree. It > will not slow down eCos, it will be conditionally compilable. I > can do the CDL if requested. How do I get it into CVS? Post the patch to ecos-patches. We the community can then take a look at it and decide what needs doing to make it incorperatable, eg cdl, making it more generic etc. > -Rich > > P.S. hal_ctrlc_check gets called a LOT and seems to get called > more, the more pings I send it. I haven't debugged this to find out > why, but it's perplexing. Anybody know what is going on with it? This function acts as the interface between the application network stack and redboot. Each packet received by the application is passed down to redboot to let it decide if the packet is actually for the redboot stack, not the application stack. Andrew -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss