From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2082 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2002 08:59:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2054 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2002 08:59:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rubicon.hasler.ascom.ch) (139.79.129.1) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Nov 2002 08:59:29 -0000 Received: from eiger.ma.tech.ascom.ch (eiger.ma.tech.ascom.ch [139.79.100.1]) by rubicon.hasler.ascom.ch (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id gAK8xPO06096; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:59:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch ([139.79.100.27]) by eiger.ma.tech.ascom.ch with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 18EQhg-0007J8-00; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:59:24 +0100 Received: by biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id JAA20459; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:59:22 +0100 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:59:00 -0000 From: Andrew Lunn To: Gary Thomas Cc: rhea santos , eCos Discussion Message-ID: <20021120085922.GD20349@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> Mail-Followup-To: Gary Thomas , rhea santos , eCos Discussion References: <3DD9D1BA.00001B.34489@embedded3.asti.dost.gov.ph> <1037782228.11772.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1037782228.11772.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Filter-Version: 1.6 (rubicon) Subject: Re: [ECOS] GoAhead Web server X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00354.txt.bz2 On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:50:27AM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: > On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 22:52, rhea santos wrote: > > > > hi! > > I would like to ask if anyone here had already tried to use the open source > > GoAhead Web Server using assabet and eCos? What was your experience in > > building the application ? How was the support for GoAhead ? How did it > > perform ? > > > > We have run this server, but it was many years ago. I've not > tried it recently, but that older version ran fine. I played with it a few months ago. It seemed rather slow, but i never spent the time to work out why. I also had problems with GoAheads built in ROM file system when used with Lynx. Lynx added a leading /. I don't remember which, but it caused the ROM filesystem to fail to find the file. This worked OK for Nutscape. Andrew -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss