From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18415 invoked by alias); 7 May 2003 13:24:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18382 invoked from network); 7 May 2003 13:24:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailgate5.cinetic.de) (217.72.192.165) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 May 2003 13:24:30 -0000 Received: from web.de (fmomail03.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.1.236]) by mailgate5.cinetic.de (8.11.6p2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with SMTP id h47DOTi00507 for ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com; Wed, 7 May 2003 15:24:29 +0200 Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 13:24:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200305071324.h47DOTi00507@mailgate5.cinetic.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: http://freemail.web.de/ From: "Matt Kober" To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [ECOS] questions about redboot X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00115.txt.bz2 i finally got Redboot to build without out problems and after downloading it i started it with a 'go (address)' command from my bootloader. it seems to run, as i get the Redboot prompt and the version command gives some reasonable output. i tried to bebug a simple ecos example program but only get a 'continuing' on the console window of the gdb. does it cause trouble starting Redboot on an already initialized platform opposed to letting redboot handle the hardware setup ? do i need to give redboot total control over the hardware at power up time? thanks for the help, Matt ______________________________________________________________________________ UNICEF bittet um Spenden fur die Kinder im Irak! Hier online an UNICEF spenden: https://spenden.web.de/unicef/special/?mc=021101 -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss