From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31049 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2003 11:53:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31042 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2003 11:53:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO londo.lunn.ch) (80.238.139.98) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Oct 2003 11:53:47 -0000 Received: from lunn by londo.lunn.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AA6hL-0001EG-00; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:53:43 +0200 Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:53:00 -0000 To: James Yates Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <20031016115343.GG32391@lunn.ch> Mail-Followup-To: James Yates , ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [ECOS] SH2 Ports X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00298.txt.bz2 > I tried building my platform for an SH3 variant with complete > success, so I am guessing something is wrong with the SH2 variant > but without any other SH2 platform ports, it is difficult for me to > judge. I have seen mentions of a few people requiring a port of eCos > to SH2 but no mention of anyone actually having done it. My feeling > was that maybe this is a compiler bug, gcc v3.2.1 so I have > downloaded and tried to build gcc for SH-elf target v 3.3.1 and > v3.2.2 but also without success. Reading what little information that is in eCos, it looks like there has been a SH2 port in the past. There is a driver for the SH2-etherC Ethernet Controller as well. What this normally means is that the (ex)RedHat guys where contracted to port to a customers SH2 board. This was never made public either because it was a custom designed board not a development board, or the customer did not want it made public. I suggest you contact the exRedHat guys who now work at eCosCentric and see what they can tell you. Maybe the port also had a custom version of gcc and the changes never got rolled back into the mainstream version? Maybe they can point you towards the old compiler sources etc... Andrew -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss