From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 998 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2003 10:57:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 989 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2003 10:57:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO londo.lunn.ch) (80.238.139.98) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Nov 2003 10:57:08 -0000 Received: from lunn by londo.lunn.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AMQ1C-0005Uu-00; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:57:06 +0100 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:57:00 -0000 To: Vincent Catros Cc: 'Andrew Lunn' , ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <20031119105706.GA21080@lunn.ch> Mail-Followup-To: Vincent Catros , 'Andrew Lunn' , ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com References: <20031119102130.GA21008@lunn.ch> <001901c3ae8a$10229e90$7407a8c0@figuier> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001901c3ae8a$10229e90$7407a8c0@figuier> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Andrew Lunn Subject: [ECOS] Re: RE : [ECOS] Multiple partitions on a FLASH device. X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2 > OK, this will work on a "Linux Synthetic Target" because that way we > create a totaly separated FLASH device. How are they seperate. I don't understand what you mean. > But I plan to use multiple partitions on a real device where, for > instance, "/dev/flash1" and "/dev/flash2" are on the same device but on > different locations. > > I think this is not possible without modifying the FLASH driver. What do you think is wrong with the FLASH driver. Why cannot it do this? Andrew -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss