From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22892 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2003 12:43:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22881 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2003 12:43:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO iv.ro) (194.105.28.94) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Nov 2003 12:43:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 24665 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2003 07:23:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cow) (192.168.1.4) by 192.168.1.1 with SMTP; 20 Nov 2003 07:23:22 -0000 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:43:00 -0000 From: Jani Monoses To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20031120143136.68a54d20.jani@iv.ro> In-Reply-To: <20031120123931.GB9114@lunn.ch> References: <20031120130610.0fde112f.jani@iv.ro> <20031120123931.GB9114@lunn.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [ECOS] Re: remove NOT_IN_RAM handling X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00265.txt.bz2 > > Humm. This needs some discussion. There may not be any drivers in the > anoncvs repository using this, but there could be people with there > own private flash drivers which use this interface. Do we want to > break such drivers? > > Anybody with an opinion is welcome to comment. I thought there might be others using old drivers but to change them to work with this is simple. And if they track CVS they are definitely able to do such a small change. Of course others might have other opinions. Jani -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss