public inbox for ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [ECOS] What prompted the creation of the Linux Synthetic Target
@ 2003-11-20 22:45 Gregg C Levine
  2003-11-20 23:07 ` Andrew Lunn
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gregg C Levine @ 2003-11-20 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ecos-discuss

Hello again from Gregg C Levine
The explanation behind the creation of Linux Synthetic Target has
always eluded me. For example, I know it was created to allow the
running of ECOS binaries on the native build environment, which in my
case would be Linux, the distribution from Slackware, version 9.1.
Obviously folks, it was created to be distribution neutral, but I
prefer Slackware for its ease of use.
-------------------
Gregg C Levine hansolofalcon@worldnet.att.net
------------------------------------------------------------
"The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
"Use the Force, Luke."  Obi-Wan Kenobi
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to General Obi-Wan Kenobi )
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda )





--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [ECOS] What prompted the creation of the Linux Synthetic Target
  2003-11-20 22:45 [ECOS] What prompted the creation of the Linux Synthetic Target Gregg C Levine
@ 2003-11-20 23:07 ` Andrew Lunn
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2003-11-20 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gregg C Levine; +Cc: ecos-discuss

On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 05:45:49PM -0500, Gregg C Levine wrote:
> The explanation behind the creation of Linux Synthetic Target has
> always eluded me.

Its a much faster to use for development work than using real
hardware. You can go through the edit/compile/run/crash cycle much
faster since you don't have to wait for your slow serial link to
download the code before you run it and the debugger is much faster
since its all native.

You can do nearly everything you can do with real hardware using
synth.  There are flash drivers, serial driver, watchdog drivers,
ethernet drivers etc. Its also quite easy to emulate any special
hardware you might have on your target.

You can have many synth targets compared to the limited number of real
hardware targets you may have. The problem i've had in the past is
that the first 5 boards come of the pre-production line and the
management type people regularly steal them away from us software
engineers to show prospective customers, people who are funding you,
etc. It becomes really hard to do any work because you just don't have
the hardware on your desk.

For the must of the stuff i do, its not often i use real
hardware. Synth is just so much more convenient.

          Andrew

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-11-20 23:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-11-20 22:45 [ECOS] What prompted the creation of the Linux Synthetic Target Gregg C Levine
2003-11-20 23:07 ` Andrew Lunn

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).