From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24275 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2003 11:35:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24249 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2003 11:35:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO londo.lunn.ch) (80.238.139.98) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2003 11:35:04 -0000 Received: from lunn by londo.lunn.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AU2cO-0005yR-00; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:35:00 +0100 Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 11:35:00 -0000 To: Daniel N?ri Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <20031210113500.GO2527@lunn.ch> Mail-Followup-To: Daniel N?ri , ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com References: <20031210083829.GN2527@lunn.ch> <87brqglyaj.fsf@fnord.hq.sigicom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87brqglyaj.fsf@fnord.hq.sigicom.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [ECOS] Re: No zlib crc32 support? X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00119.txt.bz2 On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 12:14:44PM +0100, Daniel N?ri wrote: > Andrew Lunn writes: > > > I would be reluctant to put back the crc32 function in zlib. Its a > > step back towards chaos, bigger images and potential naming > > problems. > > The recently released zlib 1.2.1 (not yet in eCos) has a new CRC32 > implementation which is claimed to be about 50% faster than the old > one. > > This would possibly be a good argument to at least make it > configurable which one to use. Or maybe even replace the eCos CRC32 > implementation with the new one from zlib... I would probably go for replacing on the in the CRC package, but it would depend on how they have made it faster. Submit a patch and i will take a look. Andrew -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss