From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-discuss-return-26512-listarch-ecos-discuss=sources.redhat.com@ecos.sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28196 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2004 12:07:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-discuss-subscribe@ecos.sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org>, <http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 28160 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2004 12:07:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO londo.lunn.ch) (80.238.139.98)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2004 12:07:03 -0000
Received: from lunn by londo.lunn.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BBWMJ-0001am-00; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 12:02:07 +0200
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 12:25:00 -0000
To: Nick Garnett <nickg@ecoscentric.com>
Cc: Alan Bowman <ABowman@synaptics-uk.com>, 'Andrew Lunn' <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Gary Thomas <gary@chez-thomas.org>, ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Message-ID: <20040408100207.GH29940@lunn.ch>
Mail-Followup-To: Nick Garnett <nickg@ecoscentric.com>,
	Alan Bowman <ABowman@synaptics-uk.com>,
	'Andrew Lunn' <andrew@lunn.ch>, Gary Thomas <gary@chez-thomas.org>,
	ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
References: <81D9DC7CCBF5D311AEC000508BC20765E76F40@uk_exchange.synaptics-uk.com> <m3u0zuu8wp.fsf@miso.calivar.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m3u0zuu8wp.fsf@miso.calivar.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Subject: Re: [ECOS] ROMRAM stand-alone application
X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00140.txt.bz2

> > I don't think it's ever worked for me (before the changes that I'm
> > hopefully about to post).  I'm trying to access the CVS server, and
> > I can't seem to get a response.  Is it working at the moment?
> 
> The ROMRAM RedBoot fell by the wayside. With so little RAM available
> on these boards it was felt that it was a waste of resource. Hence the
> ROMRAM .ldi files have suffered a little bitrot.

We have two options. Fix the bitrot so that ROMRAM RedBoot works
again, or change the ROMRAM so that it works for standalone
applications.

Nick says that ROMRAM redboot makes little sense, so i would suggest
the second option. Is everybody happy with that?

    Andrew

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss