From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4627 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2004 16:57:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4619 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2004 16:57:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 Jun 2004 16:57:12 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5BGvBi7000634 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:57:12 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5BGvB009359; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:57:11 -0400 Received: from deneb.localdomain (msalter.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.36]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5BGvAVN014395; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:57:11 -0400 Received: by deneb.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6E68A7907B; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:57:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Mark Salter To: krishnag@marakicorp.com Cc: lgagne@yahoo.com, ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <00bc01c44fd2$cf4b6dd0$6701a8c0@marakicorp.com> (krishnag@marakicorp.com) References: <20040608184330.67693.qmail@web50807.mail.yahoo.com> <20040608192009.422807907B@deneb.localdomain> <00bc01c44fd2$cf4b6dd0$6701a8c0@marakicorp.com> Message-Id: <20040611165710.6E68A7907B@deneb.localdomain> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:57:00 -0000 Subject: [ECOS] Re: Can we add the intel npe package to the latest sources? (was Re: [ECOS] Problems programming Intel's J3 Stratoflash chip) X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00116.txt.bz2 >>>>> Krishna Ganugapati writes: > Hello, > I'm using the latest cvs sources and building redboot for a custom ixp425 > board. We're using the npes on the ixp425 and have downloaded the npe > packages from Intel. On reading the instructions from Intel it says that we > need to download the sources from Redhat(which includes fixes for block lock > status bits the StrataFlash 28F128J3(C)). Once that is done, we're supposed > to just add the npe package to these sources using ecosadmin.tcl. > My questions: > 1)I'd like to use the latest cvs sources - I'm integrating some of the pci > ide support and other stuff. > Can I just add the npe package directly to the cvs sources and work off of > that? Has anyone done this and can vouch for the npe stuff working off their > cvs built Redboot images? This should work, but I haven't done it in a while. > Note: I was successfully able to add the npe package direct to my anonymous > cvs tree..(but that doesn't necessarily mean that the two are compatible) > 2)I've seen a few postings (one from Mark Salter saying that the block lock > status bits fix for the J3C will be checked in to the latest sources - has > this been done? I have ye to ssync my source tree - it has been a few months > now and was wondering whether this has been done? This is the one I was thinking of: 2003-10-29 Jonathan Larmour * src/flash_unlock_block.c (flash_unlock_block): test lock bit explicitly - newer flash parts use the reserved bits in the returned data. > 3) When Intel says the Redboot do they mean the cvs sources... Probably the tarball in: ftp://ftp.ges.redhat.com/private/gnupro-xscale-030422 That source base is fairly old but was in sync with the cvs sources at one time. --Mark -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss