public inbox for ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [ECOS] license
@ 2004-07-07 23:43 pierre
  2004-07-08  0:23 ` Chris Gray
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: pierre @ 2004-07-07 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ecos-discuss

Hello all,

I would like to sell a product based on ecos but I
have been afraid to 
use GPL after reading this article:

What do you think ?
also do you have already company using ecos ? and
selling products...

Ps: I found it on a website of a RTOS vendor : green
hill, I don't want to blaim anyone..

sincerely
pierre


The thousands of contributors to GPLed RTOSes each own
the copyright to their contribution. Many contributors
are identified only by an 
e-mail address.    
vUnder the GPL, the managers of a GPLed project
disclaim any 
responsibility for collecting valid copyright
assignments from the contributors. 
None the contributors state that their contributions
do not infringe 
copyrights, trade secrets, or patents. Any contributor
who hasn't signed 
a valid copyright assignment, or anyone from whom any
contributor stole 
software, or any contributor's employer who legally
owns the copyright 
to any work they did on company time or with company
computers, or the 
holders of patents any contributor inadvertently
infringed, can sue you 
and all of your customers. 
vIf you violate any term of the GPL to even the
slightest extent, your 
license to distribute the RTOS terminates
automatically. 
   

sincerely


	

	
		
Créez gratuitement votre Yahoo! Mail avec 100 Mo de stockage !
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.benefits.yahoo.com/

Dialoguez en direct avec vos amis grâce à Yahoo! Messenger !Téléchargez Yahoo! Messenger sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [ECOS] license
  2004-07-07 23:43 [ECOS] license pierre
@ 2004-07-08  0:23 ` Chris Gray
  2004-07-08 20:26   ` David N. Welton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Gray @ 2004-07-08  0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pierre, ecos-discuss

On Thursday 08 July 2004 01:43, pierre wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to sell a product based on ecos but I
> have been afraid to
> use GPL after reading this article:
>
> What do you think ?
> also do you have already company using ecos ? and
> selling products...
>
> Ps: I found it on a website of a RTOS vendor : green
> hill, I don't want to blaim anyone..
>
> sincerely
> pierre

Well, you could blame GreenHills, as they're the responsible publisher ...

> The thousands of contributors to GPLed RTOSes each own
> the copyright to their contribution. Many contributors
> are identified only by an
> e-mail address.
> vUnder the GPL, the managers of a GPLed project
> disclaim any
> responsibility for collecting valid copyright
> assignments from the contributors.

I don't think this has much to do with the GPL. Some projects insist on rather 
formal copyright assignments from their contributors; others don't. Those 
that do include anything run by the FSF, and eCos. Those that don't are 
living dangerously, bu tprobably account for 99% of the projects on 
SourceForge or wherever.

> None the contributors state that their contributions
> do not infringe
> copyrights, trade secrets, or patents. Any contributor
> who hasn't signed
> a valid copyright assignment, or anyone from whom any
> contributor stole
> software, or any contributor's employer who legally
> owns the copyright
> to any work they did on company time or with company
> computers, or the
> holders of patents any contributor inadvertently
> infringed, can sue you
> and all of your customers.

And GreenHills can be certain that none of their software violates any patent 
ever issued? If they know how to do that, they should market the service; it 
could prove to be far more valuable than just selling operating systems.

> vIf you violate any term of the GPL to even the
> slightest extent, your
> license to distribute the RTOS terminates
> automatically.

On paper, yes; and I expect that GreenHills' contracts contain similar clauses 
(mine certainly do). In practice it means that if you are distributing 
software in a way which conflicts with the license, you need to (1) change 
your behaviour, (2) negotiate the transition, (3) with some sense of urgency. 
I don't see a big difference here between eCos and Integrity or WinCE, say.

Illegitimis non carborundum.

-- 
Chris Gray                      /k/ Embedded Java Solutions
Embedded & Mobile Java, OSGi        http://www.kiffer.be/k/
chris.gray@kiffer.be                         +32 3 216 0369


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [ECOS] license
  2004-07-08  0:23 ` Chris Gray
@ 2004-07-08 20:26   ` David N. Welton
  2004-07-09  9:13     ` Chris Gray
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David N. Welton @ 2004-07-08 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Gray; +Cc: pierre, ecos-discuss

Chris Gray <chris.gray@kiffer.be> writes:

> > Ps: I found it on a website of a RTOS vendor : green hill, I don't
> > want to blaim anyone..

> Well, you could blame GreenHills, as they're the responsible
> publisher ...

GreenHills are notorious FUD mongers.

-- 
David N. Welton
     Personal: http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/
Free Software: http://www.dedasys.com/freesoftware/
   Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org/
       Photos: http://www.dedasys.com/photos/

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [ECOS] license
  2004-07-08 20:26   ` David N. Welton
@ 2004-07-09  9:13     ` Chris Gray
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Gray @ 2004-07-09  9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David N. Welton; +Cc: pierre, ecos-discuss

On Thursday 08 July 2004 22:25, David N. Welton wrote:
> Chris Gray <chris.gray@kiffer.be> writes:
> > > Ps: I found it on a website of a RTOS vendor : green hill, I don't
> > > want to blaim anyone..
> >
> > Well, you could blame GreenHills, as they're the responsible
> > publisher ...
>
> GreenHills are notorious FUD mongers.

They are doing themselves a disservice. Anyone who has read one decent article 
on using open-source software would see the inaccuracies and be annoyed.

If you license third-party software for use in your product then you need to 
read and understand the license, period. And here "you" means not just you 
the developer, but your company and hence your company's legal advisor. Some 
open-source licenses can create real problems when mixed with proprietary 
software in embedded systems; OTOH proprietary software licenses can have 
some "interesting" clauses too. Today's latin tag: caveat emptor.

-- 
Chris Gray                      /k/ Embedded Java Solutions
Embedded & Mobile Java, OSGi        http://www.kiffer.be/k/
chris.gray@kiffer.be                         +32 3 216 0369


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-07-09  9:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-07-07 23:43 [ECOS] license pierre
2004-07-08  0:23 ` Chris Gray
2004-07-08 20:26   ` David N. Welton
2004-07-09  9:13     ` Chris Gray

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).