* [ECOS] license
@ 2004-07-07 23:43 pierre
2004-07-08 0:23 ` Chris Gray
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: pierre @ 2004-07-07 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ecos-discuss
Hello all,
I would like to sell a product based on ecos but I
have been afraid to
use GPL after reading this article:
What do you think ?
also do you have already company using ecos ? and
selling products...
Ps: I found it on a website of a RTOS vendor : green
hill, I don't want to blaim anyone..
sincerely
pierre
The thousands of contributors to GPLed RTOSes each own
the copyright to their contribution. Many contributors
are identified only by an
e-mail address.
vUnder the GPL, the managers of a GPLed project
disclaim any
responsibility for collecting valid copyright
assignments from the contributors.
None the contributors state that their contributions
do not infringe
copyrights, trade secrets, or patents. Any contributor
who hasn't signed
a valid copyright assignment, or anyone from whom any
contributor stole
software, or any contributor's employer who legally
owns the copyright
to any work they did on company time or with company
computers, or the
holders of patents any contributor inadvertently
infringed, can sue you
and all of your customers.
vIf you violate any term of the GPL to even the
slightest extent, your
license to distribute the RTOS terminates
automatically.
sincerely
Créez gratuitement votre Yahoo! Mail avec 100 Mo de stockage !
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.benefits.yahoo.com/
Dialoguez en direct avec vos amis grâce à Yahoo! Messenger !Téléchargez Yahoo! Messenger sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] license
2004-07-07 23:43 [ECOS] license pierre
@ 2004-07-08 0:23 ` Chris Gray
2004-07-08 20:26 ` David N. Welton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Gray @ 2004-07-08 0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pierre, ecos-discuss
On Thursday 08 July 2004 01:43, pierre wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to sell a product based on ecos but I
> have been afraid to
> use GPL after reading this article:
>
> What do you think ?
> also do you have already company using ecos ? and
> selling products...
>
> Ps: I found it on a website of a RTOS vendor : green
> hill, I don't want to blaim anyone..
>
> sincerely
> pierre
Well, you could blame GreenHills, as they're the responsible publisher ...
> The thousands of contributors to GPLed RTOSes each own
> the copyright to their contribution. Many contributors
> are identified only by an
> e-mail address.
> vUnder the GPL, the managers of a GPLed project
> disclaim any
> responsibility for collecting valid copyright
> assignments from the contributors.
I don't think this has much to do with the GPL. Some projects insist on rather
formal copyright assignments from their contributors; others don't. Those
that do include anything run by the FSF, and eCos. Those that don't are
living dangerously, bu tprobably account for 99% of the projects on
SourceForge or wherever.
> None the contributors state that their contributions
> do not infringe
> copyrights, trade secrets, or patents. Any contributor
> who hasn't signed
> a valid copyright assignment, or anyone from whom any
> contributor stole
> software, or any contributor's employer who legally
> owns the copyright
> to any work they did on company time or with company
> computers, or the
> holders of patents any contributor inadvertently
> infringed, can sue you
> and all of your customers.
And GreenHills can be certain that none of their software violates any patent
ever issued? If they know how to do that, they should market the service; it
could prove to be far more valuable than just selling operating systems.
> vIf you violate any term of the GPL to even the
> slightest extent, your
> license to distribute the RTOS terminates
> automatically.
On paper, yes; and I expect that GreenHills' contracts contain similar clauses
(mine certainly do). In practice it means that if you are distributing
software in a way which conflicts with the license, you need to (1) change
your behaviour, (2) negotiate the transition, (3) with some sense of urgency.
I don't see a big difference here between eCos and Integrity or WinCE, say.
Illegitimis non carborundum.
--
Chris Gray /k/ Embedded Java Solutions
Embedded & Mobile Java, OSGi http://www.kiffer.be/k/
chris.gray@kiffer.be +32 3 216 0369
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] license
2004-07-08 0:23 ` Chris Gray
@ 2004-07-08 20:26 ` David N. Welton
2004-07-09 9:13 ` Chris Gray
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David N. Welton @ 2004-07-08 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Gray; +Cc: pierre, ecos-discuss
Chris Gray <chris.gray@kiffer.be> writes:
> > Ps: I found it on a website of a RTOS vendor : green hill, I don't
> > want to blaim anyone..
> Well, you could blame GreenHills, as they're the responsible
> publisher ...
GreenHills are notorious FUD mongers.
--
David N. Welton
Personal: http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/
Free Software: http://www.dedasys.com/freesoftware/
Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org/
Photos: http://www.dedasys.com/photos/
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] license
2004-07-08 20:26 ` David N. Welton
@ 2004-07-09 9:13 ` Chris Gray
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Gray @ 2004-07-09 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David N. Welton; +Cc: pierre, ecos-discuss
On Thursday 08 July 2004 22:25, David N. Welton wrote:
> Chris Gray <chris.gray@kiffer.be> writes:
> > > Ps: I found it on a website of a RTOS vendor : green hill, I don't
> > > want to blaim anyone..
> >
> > Well, you could blame GreenHills, as they're the responsible
> > publisher ...
>
> GreenHills are notorious FUD mongers.
They are doing themselves a disservice. Anyone who has read one decent article
on using open-source software would see the inaccuracies and be annoyed.
If you license third-party software for use in your product then you need to
read and understand the license, period. And here "you" means not just you
the developer, but your company and hence your company's legal advisor. Some
open-source licenses can create real problems when mixed with proprietary
software in embedded systems; OTOH proprietary software licenses can have
some "interesting" clauses too. Today's latin tag: caveat emptor.
--
Chris Gray /k/ Embedded Java Solutions
Embedded & Mobile Java, OSGi http://www.kiffer.be/k/
chris.gray@kiffer.be +32 3 216 0369
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-07-09 9:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-07-07 23:43 [ECOS] license pierre
2004-07-08 0:23 ` Chris Gray
2004-07-08 20:26 ` David N. Welton
2004-07-09 9:13 ` Chris Gray
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).