From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: "K. Sinan YILDIRIM" <sinany@beko.com.tr>
Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [ECOS] ECOS - MIPS
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 07:03:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050623070257.GB26538@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200506230927.33072.sinany@beko.com.tr>
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 09:27:32AM +0300, K. Sinan YILDIRIM wrote:
> People may have positive and negative comments about a SW product. Does this
> group for only positive ones ? Or only positive questions ?
>
> I have been writing SW for about 10 years. I have just examined eCOS and found
> that it is configurable on some way and unconfigurable ( hard to reconfigure
> ) on some way. May be it is much more configurable than the existing ones but
> not a super really configurable OS.
>
> I am the user. This is a user point of view . Having a seperate HAL layer or a
> structured file tree doesnt make an operating system really configurable.
> Configurability means to change the operating system according to your needs
> in a quick way : not being able to change it in a month...
>
> configurable modern SW is done with SW patterns. Architectural and Design
> patterns makes SW configurable, easy to change, etc... Embedded SW needs good
> architectural design with really reusable architectural and design patterns.
> What makes JAVA popular is these points. It is a programming framework that
> fullfills these points.
>
> eCOS is not a really framework. When you read the documentation, it seems to
> be an OS framework but indeed it doesn't.
>
> What i try to mean is we must make it better in order to make it usable in the
> future.
Could you give some examples of what you would change?
Thanks
Andrew
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-23 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <W646741726646371119364845@webmail3>
2005-06-22 7:09 ` K. Sinan YILDIRIM
2005-06-22 10:21 ` Fabian Scheler
2005-06-22 18:28 ` L D
2005-06-23 6:29 ` K. Sinan YILDIRIM
2005-06-23 7:03 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
[not found] ` <200506231102.17394.sinany@beko.com.tr>
2005-06-23 8:07 ` K. Sinan YILDIRIM
2005-06-23 8:34 ` Jerome Souquieres
2005-06-23 9:02 ` Andrew Lunn
2005-06-23 10:27 ` K. Sinan YILDIRIM
2005-06-23 15:28 ` [ECOS] " Grant Edwards
2005-06-24 6:14 ` K. Sinan YILDIRIM
2005-06-24 9:07 ` Nick Garnett
2005-06-24 14:08 ` Grant Edwards
2005-06-24 14:52 ` K. Sinan YILDIRIM
2005-06-24 16:39 ` Grant Edwards
2005-06-23 16:19 ` [ECOS] " Richard Forrest
2005-06-24 0:04 ` [ECOS] " Grant Edwards
2005-06-24 7:48 ` Richard Forrest
2005-06-23 15:17 ` Grant Edwards
2005-06-21 13:40 [ECOS] " K. Sinan YILDIRIM
2005-06-21 13:53 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050623070257.GB26538@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=sinany@beko.com.tr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).