From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2685 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2005 11:00:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2652 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2005 11:00:55 -0000 Received: from londo.lunn.ch (HELO londo.lunn.ch) (80.238.139.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:00:55 +0000 Received: from lunn by londo.lunn.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DnaJD-0001Vp-00; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:00:47 +0200 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:00:00 -0000 To: Manfred Gruber Cc: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org Message-ID: <20050629110047.GD5563@lunn.ch> Mail-Followup-To: Manfred Gruber , ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org References: <200506290915.06896.gruber.m@utanet.at> <20050629095641.GA5563@lunn.ch> <200506291220.18925.gruber.m@utanet.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200506291220.18925.gruber.m@utanet.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [ECOS] change to flash_v2 tree problem X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00286.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 12:20:18PM +0200, Manfred Gruber wrote: > > Does you have two block in use, one for fis and one for config or is > > it a shared block? > > I use two. OK. So it might be an off by one error. It could be trying to acccess the byte after the end of the flash... Andrew -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss