From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6768 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2005 11:06:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 6742 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2005 11:06:09 -0000 Received: from mail.contec.at (HELO mail.contec.at) (213.229.28.240) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:06:09 +0000 Received: from fs-1.contec-int.at (unknown [192.168.1.221]) by mail.contec.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFC4370BF for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 12:59:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from grma-linux-2.contec-int.at ([192.168.1.216]) by fs-1.contec-int.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:05:55 +0200 From: Manfred Gruber To: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:06:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200506290915.06896.gruber.m@utanet.at> <20050629095641.GA5563@lunn.ch> <200506291220.18925.gruber.m@utanet.at> In-Reply-To: <200506291220.18925.gruber.m@utanet.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506291305.52366.gruber.m@utanet.at> Subject: Re: [ECOS] change to flash_v2 tree problem X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00287.txt.bz2 Hi ! Sorry for the disturbing, found my problem. Its not in flash handling is in Ethernet ESA handling, which I have changed. My mistake ... my handling breaks the flash_config_insert_value... I will change my handling to correct use in redboot now. Have you any, some information for me how I get am29xxxxx_v2 working, about what must i take care. Sorry thanks regards manfred -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss