From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30071 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2005 19:50:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 30033 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2005 19:49:53 -0000 Received: from londo.lunn.ch (HELO londo.lunn.ch) (80.238.139.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 19:49:53 +0000 Received: from lunn by londo.lunn.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DniZB-0003OM-00; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:49:49 +0200 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 19:50:00 -0000 To: John Eigelaar Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <20050629194949.GD8479@lunn.ch> Mail-Followup-To: John Eigelaar , ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com References: <6.2.1.2.2.20050629161718.01dcc700@mail.au.varianinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [ECOS] Re: AT91RM9200-EK Port X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00295.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:53:51AM +0200, John Eigelaar wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:19:59 +1000, stewart hamilton wrote: > > > Hi John > > > > I know its early days yet. But as we are just about to embark on an > > evaluation of ecos on the > > AT91RM9200-EK board and have no previous ecos experience, was wondering how > > your port to this board is going > > > > Regards > > Stewart > > Stewart, > > I haven't actually started yet. I have spent the last two days inspecting > the ARM HAL structure. The AT91RM9200 present a bit of a conundrum - it is > a an at91 part as well as an arm9 part. At this point I am not sure > whether to start it as an at91 variant and use the stuff from the arm9 HAL > as well, or start with an arm9 platfrom and just use the at91 variants a e > reference. At this point in time I am leaning towards the arm9 starting > point just because stuff like cahces and MMU controllers has already been > used in these platforms. I beleave eCosCentric have already a port for the AT91RM9200. Maybe they could share there experiance. Did they use the at91 var or the arm9 var? Andrew -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss